-
Website
http://www.epltalk.com -
Original page
http://www.epltalk.com/sheffield-united-players-should-sue-west-ham-united/3313 -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
jm1
5 comments · 1 points
-
PorkRomeo
4 comments · 1 points
-
eplnfl
43 comments · 3 points
-
ChrissMari
18 comments · 3 points
-
AtlantaPompey
69 comments · 3 points
-
-
Popular Threads
Yes, Tevez was one of the many reasons Sheff U went down, but that's neither here nor there because he was legally registered just like the rest of the WHU squad, and the Sheff U squad.
You are a deluded fool. How an earth can you say this? If Tevez didn't play, then someone else would. If Tevez hadn't signed in the first place, then West Ham might not have been involved in a relgation battle in the first place. All these points are subjective, just like your pathetic FACT.
Especially when these articles rarely report true facts, they are mainly based on assumption and information gathered from other such useless news reports.
the only thing that im concerned about is WHY ON EARTH DID WHU AGREE TO AN INDEPENDANT TRIBUNAL ? sheff utd had already lost 2 court cases and their greedy northern chairman MCcabe stated before the first court case that "this is not about money"
i hope our lawyers put a stop to all this rubbish as it could upset our season, just when we thought we were back on track.
Sue West Ham because of loss of earnings???
why not sue every other team that took points of you that season as well, oh don't forget the referee who awarded Liverpool that penalty. Why don't the club sue thier own players for not being good enough to win the games in the first place or the fans for not cheering loud enough to spur the players on..... we could go on all day here.
Please West Ham supporters, don't sink to Sheffield Utd. levels.
The purchase of Tevez and Masherano were one of the main reasons West Ham had such an unsettled season, the year before getting to the FA Cup final?? The Premier League registered these players, legally.
Its funny how teams didn't mention this issue until in trouble at the end of the season, which we must remember, was due to poor performances. How a Sheffield United fan can back players who got their team relegated due to perfomances is beyond me. Do they deserve compensation? Hell no.
Amazing how something like this shows off people true colors. This site has been crap for some time.
I'll say it again, thank you for your readership and continued readership.
As for Warnock, so he has relegation on his CV, others have far worse, Joey Barton's must be a great read.
Ignore this guy, ignore those players, they will never win.
Get over it and grow up!
Tevez was cleared to play by the EPL after they heard the case and imposed the fine with 3 games left in the season. Sheffield still had their fate in their own hands and it's the fault of the Sheffield players that they didn't have the skill, determination and guts to save their own skins.
So what next, will the Sheffield fans sue for emotional stress? Will the pubs and shops around Bramall Lane sue for loss of income as well?
Kiss goodbye to the beautiful game if you let the lawyers decide the winners and losers.
its clear now that its just personal for you. as you have a very thin grasp of the facts of this situation. and maybe its easier for you that way to hold onto this line of argument that the Club is a bunch of cheats.
I could run through this item by item but its frankly old and boring. Do you even understand what it is that let SUFC finally win on its 4th or 5th try???
Do you understand why they won this last judgement?
its from hearsay. That Scott Duxbury had a gentleman's agreement with MSI to release Tevez at seasons end. And that was brought forward by a reporter, who had no other proof then hearsay. not even from Kia or Duxbury. mind you this was after the fine, and only in regard to the last three matches.
This was the new evidence that McCabe was screaming about. Not sure how familiar you are with the law in free countries but hearsay isn't admissible.
as for YOU. its one thing to have a blog entry where you state what is in papers etc.. but to say "Sheffield United Players Should Sue West Ham United" the key word being SHOULD - then you need to have some sort of editorial reasoning behind that. In other words you need to prove they SHOULD by providing cause, not just effect.
and no player will sue West Ham. Because they can't. They'd have to sue the FA since it was the FA the 'allowed' them to remain in the league. And I'm not a legal expert, but from things I've read and heard about such suits is they have about as much chance of suing WHU as I do suing SUFC for wasting my time writing this.
and personally I'd like to know how you came up with the assertion " Now that the Football Association appointed arbitration hearing has ruled in the favor of Sheffield United, the club’s players have every right to sue West Ham" what are you basing that statement on?? and as far as I was aware the biggest relegation wage cut can be is 25% so where does your 30 to 50% come from...
not to mention every story I've read mentions 10 players not 12.
are you just making this stuff up?
and what is REALLY the message out of this... is it that smaller clubs like West Ham will be given the shaft for the same activity that routinely happens at 'big four' clubs, you may recall a certain wink wink handshake deal Man U had that very same season. But it was not proceeded with because most of the evidence was 'hearsay'. or just about any deal that happens at CFC
have a good weekend
Obviously we disagree about the statements made in this article. It's a matter of my opinion, which you don't agree with -- and you're entitled to that.
But rather than be negative, let's turn it around. If you're not satisfied with the quality of the articles here, I've given you an opportunity to write your own. You ignored that.
So, tell me, what topics would you like to see covered that you feel would be interesting to read. Your feedback is welcomed.
Cheers,
The Gaffer