EPL Talk - Latest Comments in Measuring the quality of the EPL

Re: Measuring the quality of the EPL

Not a moron — Tue, 01 May 2007 15:18:00 -0000

You're a moron

Re: Measuring the quality of the EPL

JC — Thu, 02 Feb 2006 13:50:00 -0000

Hasn't this always been the case with English football? Hasn't it always been a league where there are 2-3 great teams and the rest a notch down? I've only been following the league for about 10 years so I'm not familiar enough with the history to know for sure. From what I've read though, it seems like this is the way it's always been.

And isn't it the same in every European league. And more importantly, doesn't it have to be? If there was a level of parity akin to the NFL - where one year a team is good and the next they're awful - the Champions League and other various European competitions would be invalidated (or at least, horrendous to watch). In European soccer it seems like there's a need for dynasties.

Thoughts?

Re: Measuring the quality of the EPL

The Gaffer — Thu, 02 Feb 2006 12:46:00 -0000

Good comments by everyone. I should clarify that the three categories are based on the team's current excitement level, not position within the table.

Man United was one of the team's that I was considering for "Masterful," but their performances of late, other than their huge win against Liverpool, have left much to be desired. Just in the past few weeks, they've lost against Blackburn and Man City.

Wigan is definitely the anomaly. They haven't spend millions, but their performances and never-say-die attitude have been astounding.

Re: Measuring the quality of the EPL

Yam — Thu, 02 Feb 2006 09:45:00 -0000

If this is based on current performance then Arsenal and not Man Utd. Should be in the mediocre bucket.

Re: Measuring the quality of the EPL

Anonymous — Wed, 01 Feb 2006 14:02:00 -0000

Wigan over Man U? Wigan is a fluke. Man U sits at second in the Premiership right now.

Re: Measuring the quality of the EPL

LoRo — Wed, 01 Feb 2006 12:49:00 -0000

If your article was not about money creating a divide in the EPL calling Wigan masterful would be acceptable.

However they are a great example of what a 'poor' club is able to achieve in a special season.

Re: Measuring the quality of the EPL

JC — Wed, 01 Feb 2006 09:17:00 -0000

You have Man U as a mediocre team. You're kidding, right? I can't stand them either, but they're clearly in the Masterful group.

If your list is strictly based on this season, then I agree (except for Man U).

If we're talking long-term though, I'd say there are the 4 super powers (Chelsea, Arsenal, Man U, Liverpool), a few teams that have been at that level and/or could reach that level (Blackburn, Newcastle, Spurs, Villa) and the rest that are hoping for a Roman Abromovich-type miracle.