<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>EPL Talk - Latest Comments in Do Early Results Spell Hope for Parity in Premier League?</title><link>http://epltalk.disqus.com/</link><description>Daily News &amp; Analysis of the English Premier League</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 00:48:27 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Do Early Results Spell Hope for Parity in Premier League?</title><link>http://www.epltalk.com/do-early-results-spell-hope-for-parity-in-premier-league/2994#comment-2216036</link><description>so what if liverpool are poorly organised there winning and thats what counts</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">justin</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 00:48:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do Early Results Spell Hope for Parity in Premier League?</title><link>http://www.epltalk.com/do-early-results-spell-hope-for-parity-in-premier-league/2994#comment-2216035</link><description>Hardly, it's only a matter of time till teams start having to deal with injuries and then the real power of the Big 4 and their would-be usurpers will come into play.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RHYbread</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 23:40:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do Early Results Spell Hope for Parity in Premier League?</title><link>http://www.epltalk.com/do-early-results-spell-hope-for-parity-in-premier-league/2994#comment-2216034</link><description>Excellent article Richard. Both Arsenal and Liverpool look well under form in the first two matches, and we'll have to wait and see whether Man United will recover from their hangover on Monday.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Stoke, Hull, Villa, Sunderland, Boro and Newcastle have all thoroughly impressed me thus far.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cheers,&lt;br&gt;The Gaffer</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">The Gaffer</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 21:03:51 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>