<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>EPL Talk - Latest Comments in Chelsea Eyeing Guus Hiddink &amp;amp; Two Coaches</title><link>http://epltalk.disqus.com/</link><description>Daily News &amp; Analysis of the English Premier League</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 21:58:00 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Chelsea Eyeing Guus Hiddink &amp;amp; Two Coaches</title><link>http://www.epltalk.com/chelsea-eyeing-guus-hiddink-two-coaches/681#comment-2198190</link><description>I really don't understand the logic of throwing away Jose Mourinho if he is still doing an exceptional job at Stamford Bridge. Granted I am not a Chelsea supporter, he still has Chelsea in the hunt for the League title as well as the Champions League. &lt;br&gt;Unless he really does leave at the end of the season for Real Madrid.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But seriously, the players respond to him! So why make the changes is nothing is really broken?&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Llewellyn</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 21:58:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chelsea Eyeing Guus Hiddink &amp;amp; Two Coaches</title><link>http://www.epltalk.com/chelsea-eyeing-guus-hiddink-two-coaches/681#comment-2198189</link><description>I wouldn't believe anything the Independent wrote about Chelsea.  They had Christian Vieri as a dead certainty to join CFC a few years ago.  Their stories suffer from an almost complete lack of direct quotes and are full of vague phrases such as "are believed to be..." and "are understood to..."  Shoddy journalism.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 13:09:00 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>